By now you may be wondering – just how long is this Bordeaux tour?? It was 12 days, so we’re more than halfway done recapping our visits (thank goodness, right?) – and we have the fabulous town of Sauternes coming up next.
So far, all had gone remarkably well on our tour. But we were confronted with an unusual circumstance this evening – we didn’t have dinner scheduled anywhere.
After eating so much heavy food (I’m normally gluten and dairy-free), I really was craving something light. We were heading in the direction of Bordeaux city as we went back to our hotel that evening, so we asked Nicolas Glumineau of Pichon Lalande at lunch that day for a dinner recommendation. I threw out sushi, and he threw me a look – apparently that was asking for a lot in Bordeaux.
Then he remembered a Japanese restaurant in town very near where we had stayed the previous weekend. He couldn’t remember the name, but he sketched out a little map on the back of his business card, and we thought it looked simple enough.
We made our way back to Bordeaux easily enough and found parking without fuss. As we drove through town, I saw a small restaurant on the corner very near where we had originally stayed, advertising sushi. We decided it could be the back-up plan.
We followed the little map as best we could, but the best thing we could find was the store Badie – no sushi, but a store of all champagne – Bob thought he’d died and gone to heaven. The concept appeared to be well done – a store with champagne on one side of the street, and another store with Bordeaux wines on the other side of the street. We skidded to a halt in front of the well-done windows – just as they were about to close. We decided the trip back into town was worth it just to discover this little concept.
We also discovered another engaging store-front, this time, a display of armagnacs and cognacs – which were actually very popular in the region. Bob is always wondering why more stores and bars don”t make better use of lighting – I wish the picture was better – the whole store was glowing amber.
But try as we might, we could not discover that Japanese restaurant. So off to Plan B. To be honest, we knew when we walked in that we should walk out of this little restaurant, but we were so hungry, and at the very least, this place looked like it would be quick. It was the Bordeaux version of the Japanese conveyor-belt sushi restaurant, not so far off from what I had been asking for. The execution of the concept was so poorly done though, machine-made rolls, dried-out rice, fishy-smelling sushi – it was disappointing to settle in for a bad meal, but we were so hungry, we gave up and braved it.
Naturally, we don’t have any good wine recommendations coming out of this dinner experience, but we more than made up for it the next day in Sauternes, and we keep wondering if Seattle needs a champagne shop like Badie…
Chateau Palmer was a little farther away than we expected after lunch, so we flew through Margaux to find the estate. But there was no missing the beautiful Chateau with it’s blue trim and ornate ironwork.
Chateau Palmer gets its name from Major General Charles Palmer of the British Army, who purchased the estate in 1814 from the Gascq family. Charles Palmer lived mainly in England and was a man of English society, promoting the wines of Chateau Palmer to popularity with the English Court and the London clubs. In 1853 the Pereire brothers purchased the estate and reorganized the entire vineyard. Unfortunately, the vineyards were not ready in time to be considered for first growth status in the 1855 classification. Chateau Palmer was classified as a third growth even though they have been recognized as one of the best estates in Bordeaux. The Pereire brothers hired Bordeaux architect Burguet to build the estate house of Chateau Palmer in 1856, which was modeled after the estate house of Chateau Pichon Baron. They are both beautiful Chateaux and you can definitely see the similarities between the two.
We joined a larger tour already in progress with visitors from Vancouver, B.C., close to home. Like many other estates, Chateau Palmer combines the use of modern stainless steel vats with traditional wine making practices. They use an optical sorter for their wines – much like many of the other Chateaux of the region. In fact, we had several interesting conversations about the use of the optical sorter as we toured various Chateaux. Some feel it is cheating, but many Chateaux have realized it’s worth the extra investment to make certain those “less than optimum” grapes don’t make it into production – especially when the production is sizable.
While the optical sorter will reduce yields, it also has a direct impact on higher quality. On a very good-to-great vintage, the optical sorter has less effect, but on a trying vintage, the optical sorter can make a great difference. In fact, when we were touring one estate, our guide jokingly told us that they were grateful to have an optical sorter, because they give their volunteer pickers the more intense wine made from the lees at lunch each day, so they are glad to have the optical sorter at the end of the day to ensure quality!
Here are the wines we tasted:
2008 Alter Ego Palmer – Nice dark floral fruit on the nose. Dark cherries with good acidity, slightly coarse but sweet tannins. Medium in body, but slightly one dimensional and a medium length tannic finish. Needs several more years to round out in the mouth.
2004 Palmer – Nice nose of red and black fruit with spice and a hint of wood. The nose is more evolved than the pallet. In the mouth, it tastes like a warm dark black currant and blackberry pie, with a noticeable spicy characteristic to it, no doubt from the 7% Petite Verdot. Good acidity, but a little dry and tannic on the medium long finish. I think the wine is well made and is just in its adolescent awkward stage and could use another five years or so to round into shape.
Chateau Palmer makes some excellent wines that age gracefully. A couple of Palmer’s older wines that are drinking beautifully now are the 1989 and 1983. We have several bottles of the 1989 in our cellar, and I’m betting they’ll continue to drink well from now over the next decade…
We were looking forward to visiting Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande in Pauillac, because a friend of ours, Nicolas Glumineau, is the new General Manager and Winemaker. We have gotten to know Nicolas over a six-year period from a Bordeaux dinner that is held every year in Seattle, where he represented Chateau Montrose. In late 2012, Nicolas left Chateau Montrose, where he was Technical Director, to run Pichon Lalande. Clearly, it is a great opportunity for him – but not without its challenges.
Upon arrival, we were surprised to see just how much work they had done on the construction project. They were in the process of building an entirely new state-of-the-art vat room, barrel room and winemaking facility, and harvest was looming large, just as they were putting the finishing touches on things. In fact, we had planned our trip thinking that we would be touring during harvest, but it was turning out to be a very late season this year.
We had to laugh as Nicolas toured us around, when we marveled at his luck with the timing of the harvest, he simply replied, “it was in the contract!” The new vat room is an impressive site – in fact, I found it to be easily on par with Cos d’Estournel, which everyone throughout the region raved about as being a technical marvel. It was clear that Pichon Lalande had decided to reinvest a huge amount of money into their winemaking facility, to join the ranks of the elite few Chateaux in Bordeaux that combine the world’s best technology, with the traditional wine making practices and expertise. The build-out has been estimated at roughly $21 million – I cannot wait to taste the future wines that will be made at Pichon Lalande.
As we walked through the construction site, we stood in a gallery off to the side of the vat room that overlooked not only the vineyards below, but looked down on Chateau Latour. Not a bad view for the planned events that will take place in the space in the future.
Nicolas was a very charming host, and we couldn’t have appreciated the time he spent with us any more if we tried. In the midst of what was clearly a very busy time for him, he took the time to welcome us with a wonderful lunch, spirited conversation about the region and some really spectacular wines.
For lunch we enjoyed:
2010 Pichon Lalande – Dark blackberry fruit on the nose. In the mouth, deep dark velvety blackberry fruit fills every millimeter of your mouth. The wine has excellent acidity and very fine tannins that lead to a beautifully long sweet dark fruit finish that doesn’t want to end. All I can say is, wow! This wine has so much going on, I cannot wait to see how it evolves over the decades to come. In ten years, once the secondary characteristics start to show, the complexity of this wine is going to be a really show-stopper. Pichon Lalande has knocked it out of the park with their 2010 Grand Vin and I have no doubt that it will still be drinking well 40-50 years from now. This is definitely a wine to look for.
2003 Pichon Lalande – A warm, dark fruit nose. In the mouth, it tastes like a warm deep dark blackberry fruit pie, with just a hint of alcohol. Decent acidity and mostly resolved fine tannins are making this wine drink well now, with a nice long dark fruit finish. This wine will not age like the 2010, but it is a pleasure to drink now and over the next decade or so.
1996 Pichon Lalande – This is a deep dark red color with a garnet rim. The nose of spicy red and black fruit just soars from the glass, you could smell it just sitting on the table in front of you. In the mouth, the sweet red and black fruit flavors are very complex with baking spices, tobacco, cedar and a slight green pepper note. The wine has very good acidity keeping everything lively in the mouth, but at the same time is very smooth. The very fine tannins are mostly resolved and the wine has a very long complex spicy/sweet dark fruit finish. The 1996 is an absolutely beautiful wine today and will continue to age gracefully for the next two decades. As stunning as the 1996 Pichon Lalande is though, I think it will be ultimately surpassed by the 2010. If I had to describe the wines of Pichon Lalande with one word, it would be elegance.
Time flew by at lunch – before we knew it, it was time to head out the door to Chateau Palmer. The food, wine and company was so good, we were loathe to leave, though we knew that the show was far from over for Nicolas, who still had much more work to do! We know that Nicolas will do great things at Pichon Lalande and we hope to come back to visit him again soon.
Chateau Pichon-Longueville Baron in Pauillac was our first stop this morning and very highly anticipated. We had driven by the estate a few times at this point, and it is by far one of the most spectacular Chateaux in the region. We even stopped on the way back to our hotel one night after dinner to take pictures.
Pichon Baron was one of a small group of Bordeaux wines that is responsible for making me fall in love with the wines of Bordeaux. Pichon Baron has been one of my long time favorites from Bordeaux, starting with their 1988 vintage. Both the 1989 and 1990 wines from Pichon Baron are drinking very well at this point, with the 1989 even still being a little young in my opinion. The wines from Pichon Baron are big, powerful Cabernet-dominant wines with big meaty fruit flavors. The wines of Pichon Baron are not known for being feminine or delicate, but with age you will get a lot of delicate secondary flavors to go with the big masculine fruit. I have always loved the wines of Pichon Baron and it is not by chance that we have more Pichon Baron in the cellar than any other producer in Bordeaux.
Our guide explained to us that Pichon Baron was once part of a larger estate, owned by Pierre de Rauzan, along with Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande, the estate directly across the street. In 1850 the estate was divided into the two current Pichon estates. In 1987 the estate was purchased by French insurance company AXA. The property is currently managed by Englishman Christian Seely.
When we were in the barrel room, we saw something we had only heard about but hadn’t seen yet. There were workers that were fining the wine in the barrels, which consists of adding egg whites in order to facilitate the removal of particles of matter from the wine. We also saw they were cleaning empty barrels to prepare them for wine by burning sulfur in them – not a smell you want to spend a whole lot of time around, we assure you.
Here are the wines we tried in their tasting room:
2008 Pibran – Fruity nose, red and black fruit in the mouth, decent acid, medium-light in body and medium fruit finish. A nice inexpensive Bordeaux red wine.
2008 Les Tourelles de Longueville – Nice nose of sweet dark fruit, well rounded in the mouth with dark red bing cherries, good acidity, nice medium-fine tannin and a medium-long dark fruit finish. This is a very nice second wine that is drinking well now but will age very well over the next decade.
2008 Pichon Baron – Beautiful spicy sweet dark fruit nose. In the mouth, very dark sweet blackberries with a hint of dark bing cherries combined with baking spices, very good acidity keeping everything lively. Full bodied and lots of sweet fine tannins leading to a very nice black current and spicy blackberry long finish. This is an absolutely beautiful wine that is starting to show some nice complexity, but is still a baby. The 2008 Pichon Baron should start drinking well in another five years, but will age for two decades without even trying. The prices for both the 2009 and 2010 Pichon Baron are significantly higher than the 2008 and for good reason, but the 2008 is a relative bargain by comparison of quality/price. The 2008 Pichon Baron is a wine to look out for and I am very glad that I have it resting in my cellar.
It was a beautiful day, and we snapped a few more photos outside, before heading just across the street for a tour and lunch at Château Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande…
If you know me, you know I love a good story, and a good joke – the more ironic, the better.
So you’ll understand why I found this recent discovery to be so funny.
Our son was looking for a famous person to “be” in his third grade wax museum project. Our daughter decided he should be Arthur A. Denny, the settler who founded Seattle, and who also happens to be the great, great, great, great grandfather of our kids.
He was intrigued by the idea, and wanted to see pictures to understand what this would really be all about. Naturally, we Googled images of Arthur A., and checked him out on Wikipedia.
Now, here’s where I give you a little more background to pay off the punchline – and so that you’ll understand why this story is included on this particular blog.
In his day job, Bob, or should I say, Robert Denny Watt, III, is a diamond importer, and his business is called Exact Gems. The name “Exact” comes from the schooner that the Denny Party sailed into Seattle on in 1851, landing on the beach at Alki Point. Bob’s sister actually came up with the name for his business years ago, and it stuck.
So when we went to name this blog, I thought, why not keep the name? Thus, Exact Wines was born.
Imagine our surprise last night when, upon reading more about Arthur A. Denny’s history, we learned that he was an extreme teetotaler. Indeed, according to sources on Wikipedia, he disdained and abstained from alcohol to the point that he had the customers of his store buy their liquor direct from visiting ship captains so that he would not be involved in the transactions.
True? Who knows for sure. But to me, it sure was funny.
I was very much looking forward to visiting this next estate. At this point, Christina was probably getting tired of hearing me talk about how great their wines are – especially their whites.
Domaine de Chevalier was ranked as a Grand Cru Classe for both red and white wine in the classification of Graves wine in 1953 and 1959. The Chateau is owned by the Bernard Family and is run by Olivier Bernard, whose family bought the estate in 1983 and totally renovated it. The particular site for the estate is unusual in Bordeaux, in that it is surrounded by pine forests, which makes this site cooler than most of the surrounding areas. This coolness in the vineyard, while more prone to damaging frost, gives the red and white wines a crisp freshness to their character.
One of Olivier’s sons, Adrien, works mainly in Shanghai, China, promoting their wines throughout Asia for 7 months of the year. We were fortunate enough to catch Adrien while he was back in Bordeaux, so he gave us the tour of the estate that afternoon. They had just dipped a toe into harvest that morning, and were constantly assessing the state of the grapes at this point.
Domaine de Chevalier is a beautiful limestone estate that was rebuilt and expanded once the Bernard family purchased it. The main vat room is a big circular room with the stainless steel vats along the outside wall and a large oculus window in the center of the domed ceiling. The estate uses both concrete and stainless steel vats that are wider than they are tall, this is to increase the amount of contact the juice has with the skins that float up to the top, which is called the cap. All of the different vineyard lots from the estate are vinified separately. The estate is also experimenting with fermenting in a very large wooden egg (approx. 8 feet tall including stand), which commanded attention as we toured.
Domaine de Chevalier uses less new French oak than most Chateau in Bordeaux. The estate ages their red wine in 50% new French oak barrels for approximately 18 months depending on the vintage. The white wine is aged on its lees in 30% new French oak barrels, also for approximately 18 months, depending on the vintage and sugar levels. The estate uses Stephane Derenoncourt and Denis Dubourdieu as consulting oenologists.
2007 Domaine de Chevalier (Rouge) – Very floral red fruit and spice on the nose, in the mouth sweet red and black fruit, bright acids, good minerality and fine tannins, medium-full bodied, long sweet fruit finish. A very nice traditional Bordeaux style wine.
2012 Domaine de Chevalier Blanc – Very bright and floral white orchard fruit, with a touch of stony minerality on the nose. In the mouth, sweet white peach and melon, bright acidity and some stony pebbles, with a nice long melon and lemony mineral finish. This is a beautiful 2012 white Bordeaux.
Domaine de Chevalier makes some very nice red and white wines that age very well. The estate produces about 100,000 bottles of red wine and 18,000 bottles of white wine. Even though the estate produces more red than white wine, they are probably best known for their dry white wine. The estate produces one of the best dry white wines in all of Bordeaux, which will age for decades. Both the red and white wines from Domaine de Chevalier are wines to look out for. They are really nice Bordeaux wines that are still very reasonably price for the quality that you get in the bottle. I very much look forward to drinking more of their red and white wines in the future.
We appeared to be on a theme for the day, with scheduled visits to Chateau Haut Brion, Chateau Pape-Clement and Chateau Domaine de Chevalier, all of which are well known for producing excellent whites in addition to their reds.
Chateau Pape Clement in Pessac was named after one of it’s previous owners, Pope Clement V. The story goes that Bertrand de Goth was appointed Archbishop of Bordeaux in 1299. With this appointment, he received the Pessac vineyard as a gift, formerly known as the “de La Mothe” vineyard. In 1305 the Cardinals elected Bertrand de Goth as their new Pope and he adopted the name Pope Clement V. From 1305 to 1309 Pope Clement V continued to managed his vineyard, but when his papal duties became too much, he donated the property to the Archbishop of Bordeaux, Arnaud de Canteloup. While Pape Clement was under the management of the Archbishop, modernism and technical progress made it a pioneering estate. Chateau Pape Clement is known to be one the first estates to plant the vines in rows, versus having the vines scattered around the property. The estate of Pape Clement was purchased in 1858 by Jean-Baptiste Clerc, a Bordeaux wine merchant, who also built the Chateau on the property. In the 1980’s, an entrepreneur by the name of Bernard Magrez took over the Chateau and built the international reputation for the Grand Cru Classe, Chateau Pape Clement.
Chateau Pape Clement has 57 hectares of red grape vines (60% Cabernet Sauvignon, 40% Merlot) and 3 hectares of white grape vines (45% Sauvignon Blanc, 45% Semillon, 10% Muscadelle). The destemming of the grapes is done entirely by hand, berry by berry, which is very labor intensive. At Pape Clement, the red wines are fermented in traditional large wooden vats and aged in French oak barrels (70-100% new) for 18-20 months. The white wines are fermented entirely in French oak barrels for 12 months.
The cellar was interesting in that it was done in the style of a chapel, and actually had a small chapel inside it. There was also a fairly new structure on the property, a beautiful glass reception hall, that Christina was completely captivated by.
The wines we tasted were:
2009 Clos Haut Peyraguet – a combination of ripe melon and lemon with lots of spices and good acidity. Full bodied and a very long fruit filled finish.
2007 Pape Clement – Beautiful spicy black fruit filled nose. Full bodied sweet dark fruit in the mouth, good acidity and fine tannins on the long finish. This is a beautiful wine that is starting to drink well and is already showing some secondary characteristics. The 2007 Pape Clement will be a great wine to drink, while you wait for the 2005, 2008, 2009, and 2010 to mature.
2010 Fombrauge (from Saint-Emilion – made from Sauvignon blanc, Semillon and Sauvignon Gris) – Very clean, fresh white fruit and spices, very good acid keeping everything lively. Medium bodied, with white peach, ripe pear and a hint of pineapple on the long fresh finish. This is an absolutely beautiful summer white to be drinking overlooking the vineyards, and we went through a couple bottles of it on our trip.
Before our final stop of the day, we stopped to check into our next hotel, the beautiful les Sources de Caudalie. We can’t wait to tell you more about it…
We tore out of our beautiful apartment on Monday morning and wound our way through town to our first destination. I was very much looking forward to visiting this Chateau, and was actually surprised to find it nestled just on the outskirts of town.
Out of all the First Growth Chateaux in Bordeaux, the wines of Chateau Haut Brion in Pessac-Leognan are some of my favorites. I feel the wines of Ch. Haut Brion are more singular and unique in style than the other First Growths, it is also more geographically separated than the others as well.
We were first greeted by our wonderful hostess, Barbara, and we started things off with a short film about the history of the Chateau. Chateau Haut Brion is the oldest of the First Growths from the 1855 classification and the vineyards were fully planted a century before the other First Growths. Jean de Pontac married Jeanne de Bellon in 1525, from which part of the land of Haut Brion was brought in as a dowry. Jean de Pontac bought the title to the Domaine of Haut Brion in 1533 and built the stone Chateau in 1549. There is even evidence that the first vines planted around the property of Haut Brion date back to the first century A.D. Chateau Haut Brion and neighboring Chateau La Mission Haut Brion are both owned by the Dillon family. Clarence Dillon, an American financier, first purchased Ch. Haut Brion in 1935. Today, Prince Robert of Luxembourg is President of Domaine Clarence Dillon and the fourth generation of the Dillon family to manage this First Growth Estate.
After the film, Barbara gave us a tour around the Chateau. Haut Brion makes great Bordeaux wines by combining the use of modern technology with their traditional winemaking. Haut Brion uses large stainless steel vats that are split into two compartments each (one above and one below), so they can ferment two separate grape lots in one large cylindrical vat. Three generations of the Delmas family have been making the wines for the estate in turn since 1923, with Jean-Phillipe Delmas as the General Manager today. Haut Brion is also one of the very few Chateaux that has their own fulltime cooper making French oak barrels. This Monday morning the cooper was already hard at work making barrels and the smell of French oak filled the air.
We walked around the property a bit on the way to our tasting, it was just beautiful. The second we set foot in the orangery, Christina exclaimed that she wished she could throw a party there. I’m certain that it has housed many a distinguished event.
It was a little early to start the serious tasting, but we were up for the challenge. We were able to taste the 2007 vintages of La Mission Haut Brion and Haut Brion. Here are my notes:
2007 La Mission Haut Brion – Absolutely beautiful floral nose of red/black fruits and spices, very delicate. In the mouth the wine is medium-full bodied with a core of black fruit flavors complicated with baking spices. There is very good acidity with fine tannins following through to a very nice long sweet fruit filled finish. It is almost like lace in the way that it is very detailed and delicate. This is a beautiful wine that is all about the subtle details.
2007 Haut Brion – Bigger, darker black fruit nose with huge spice. Full bodied ripe blackberry fruit combined with loads of baking spices, gravel and burning embers. The wine has very good acidity, extremely fine but noticeable tannins and a beautifully long spicy fruit finish. This is an absolutely gorgeous wine that is drinking well now, but will age gracefully over the next decade or even two. The 2007 Haut Brion will be a great wine to drink while you are waiting for the 2000, 2005 and 2006 vintages to come to maturity.
So often, when people open a bottle of champagne, it’s for a special occasion, and it’s rare that you have several side-by-side for comparison. Therefore, every bottle you open for celebration is likely to be revered as a great bottle, though with time and tasting, there are noticeable preferences that will begin to show. That’s the philosophy behind our annual champagne tasting – an opportunity to understand more about sparkling wines. We also tend to put out a pretty big spread – so a big thanks goes to my wife for coordinating all of that!
I have always loved Champagne – and not just for special occasions, even though it seems like that’s when most people drink it. Champagne is first and foremost wine that just happens to have bubbles; it can be enjoyed before a meal, during a meal and after a meal. I generally like to start a dinner or party off with Champagne. The bubbles seem to set the stage and get everyone into a great mood for the evening.
While the party always seem to go by too fast in a blur of good friends, good food and great bubbly, throughout the course of the year, I am always on the lookout for some really nice Champagnes and sparkling wines from all over the world. For the tasting this year, we had 10 different wines, served double-blind, meaning that nobody knew what we would be drinking, other than all 10 wines had bubbles.
The majority of the wines we taste are Champagnes from the Champagne region of France. By law, for a sparkling wine to be called Champagne, it has to come from the Champagne region of France. I also want to be able to show people there are some very nice sparkling wines made outside of the Champagne region, so people can have a chance to try something they have not had before.
I did tell everyone that the low-end of the lineup was $25, the high-end was $250+ and the average price per bottle was $115. I served everyone with small pours, so that they could get through tasting all 10 wines with their taste buds intact. After someone has made it through all 10 wines, they can go back and taste again any or all of the wines to figure out which wines they like and to rank them from best to worst. At the end of the evening, we have everyone vote with a show of hands for which wine they thought was the worst and also the best. The results are usually surprising, and very often, ends with one of the most expensive wines ranked towards the bottom.
Here is the line-up for this year. All of the wines were from Champagne, France, unless otherwise noted and were served in this order:
#1 – NV Tapiz – Extra Brut, Mendoza Argentina, $25.
#2 – NV Guy Charlemagne – Brut Reserve Blanc de Blanc le Mesnil sur Oger Grand Cru, $55.
#3 – 2004 Taittinger – Comtes des Champagne Blanc de Blanc, $180.
#6 – 2010 Argyle – Brut, Willamette Valley Oregon, $25.
#7 – NV Billecart Salmon – Sous Bois, $85.
#8 – 2004 Taittinger – Comtes des Champagne Blanc de Blanc, $180.
#9 – 2004 Louis Roederer – Cristal, $240.
#10 – NV Tapiz – Extra Brut, Mendoza Argentina, $25.
Here’s a closer look at the bottles served in order:
While the 2000 vintage is a good but not great vintage for Champagne, the 2000 Krug Brut Champagne is an excellent and well made Champagne, with a long life ahead of it. The toasty fruit finish goes on and on in the mouth, long after you have swallowed it. This is just one of the many reasons why I love the Champagnes made by Krug. While I like many Champagnes from the different Champagne houses, the house of Krug continues to be my absolute favorite.
Over the 17 years that I have been doing this Champagne tasting, Argyle from Oregon has had the best results as a US produced sparkling wine against the French competition. Argyle produces some very nice wines in a range of prices, all are worth exploring. This was an interesting year for the tasting, as the wines that would normally present as a more feminine-style (soft, buttery, creamy) champagne, actually all skewed more masculine (doughy, yeasty, toasty), so there were far less polarizing results and hotly debated conversations than normal.
Here is the order on how I personally ranked the different Champagnes:
#4 – NV Guy Charlemagne – Brut Reserve Blanc de Blanc le Mesnil sur Oger Grand Cru, $55.
#5 – 2004 Bollinger – Grand Annee, $135.
#6 – 2004 Taittinger – Comtes des Champagne Blanc de Blanc, $180.
#7 – NV Billecart Salmon – Sous Bois, $85.
#8 – 2010 Argyle – Brut, Willamette Valley Oregon, $25.
#9 – NV Tapiz – Extra Brut, Mendoza Argentina, $25.
#10 – 2004 Louis Roederer – Cristal, $240.
A big surprise for the night was the fact that the Roederer Cristal came in next to last place in the group vote. While Cristal may not be the style of Champagne that I like the most in general, they are very well-made Champagnes. I am not sure what happened with the 2004 Cristal, it started off with very nice fruit but fell flat and very short on the finish. Having had Roederer Cristal on multiple occasions from multiple vintages, my guess is that this had to be an off bottle, which is a bummer. So, I guess I will have to revisit this Champagne (darn!). Despite the fact that it had a lackluster showing, I loved how Roederer chairman Federic Rouzaud described the vigor of Cristal as it ages while leading a tasting at the recent 2013 New York Wine Experience: “It makes women look more beautiful, so the men are happy, and then we make more love. So I’m very confident in our future.”